Low-code vs. traditional development: A comparison of methods

min

A developer works on several screens at the same time and writes code for a software project as part of low-code development. The focus is on the efficient implementation of complex processes.

Table of contents

Was ist Low-Code-Entwicklung?
What is traditional development?
Classic programming vs. low-code development: similarities and differences
When is which method worthwhile — and for whom?
Conclusion: When low-code development is the better choice

Imagine that your company is faced with the challenge of implementing a new software solution. You have two options: the traditional development approach, which offers tailor-made solutions through extensive programming, or the modern low-code approach, which promises quick results with minimal use of code. Which method do you choose? The decision depends on various factors, in particular what you want to implement.

What is low-code development?

Low-code development makes it possible to build applications with minimal manual programming effort. Through visual development environments and ready-made modules, even people without in-depth programming knowledge, so-called “citizen developers”, can develop software solutions. In contrast, there is no-code development, which requires absolutely no programming but offers fewer customization options.

What is traditional development?

Traditional development, also known as pro code, high code, or full code, is based on writing code manually. Experienced developers use programming languages such as Java, C# or Python to create tailor-made software solutions from scratch. This approach provides maximum flexibility and control, but requires more time and resources.

Classic programming vs. low-code development: similarities and differences

Low-code and traditional development pursue the same overall goal: creating powerful software solutions. Both methods follow a structured development process that is divided into several phases — from planning to design and implementation to testing, deployment and maintenance. Despite these similarities, there are fundamental differences in approach, required expertise, and customization options.

While classic programming offers full control over the code and maximum flexibility, Low-Code uses a visual development environment with predefined modules that significantly speed up development processes. But how do these differences actually affect scalability, adaptability, and operation? The table below shows a comparison of the most important factors.

Criterion	Low-Code Development	Traditional Development
Scalability	Suitable for small to medium-sized projects; limitations may arise with complex requirements.	High scalability; ideal for large and complex projects.
Customizability	Limited customization options due to pre-built modules.	Complete customization to meet specific requirements.
Dependency	Dependent on the chosen low-code platform and its features.	No platform dependency; full control over the code.
Integration	Integration with other systems may be limited depending on the platform.	Seamless integration with various systems through custom code.
Responsibility	Less technical knowledge required; enables involvement of business departments.	Requires experienced developers with deep technical expertise.
Hosting	Often cloud-based; hosting options vary by platform.	Flexible; can be hosted on-premises or in the cloud.
Flexibility	Limited flexibility due to pre-built components.	Maximum flexibility through custom code.
Security and Compliance	Security standards depend on the platform; potentially limited compliance customization.	Full control over security measures and compliance implementation.
Maintenance and Updates	Updates often provided by the platform; limited control over the update process.	Full control over maintenance and updates; however, more effort required.
Development Time	Faster development through pre-built modules and visual tools.	Longer development cycles due to manual coding.
Development Environment	User-friendly visual interfaces; minimal onboarding effort.	Complex development environments; requires specialized knowledge.
Deployment Options	Often fast deployment via the cloud; platform-dependent.	Flexible; can be deployed locally or in the cloud.
Performance	Performance may be limited by platform constraints.	Optimal performance through tailor-made solutions.

When is which method worthwhile — and for whom?

The choice between low-code and classic programming depends on several factors. Both approaches have their strengths and are suitable for different requirements. To determine the right method, consider the following points:

Market launch: Does the software have to be available quickly, or is the focus on tailor-made development? Low-code offers faster implementation, while classic development requires more time for customization.

Application itself/ Project goal: Is it a complex special solution or a standardized application? Classic development is suitable for highly customized software, while low-code is ideal for standard applications and automations.

Scalability: Should the application grow flexibly in the long term, or are predefined structures sufficient? Traditional development grows indefinitely with requirements, while low-code platforms can have technical limits depending on the provider.

Budget: Are large investments available for individual development, or should the solution be implemented cost-effectively? Low-code is cheaper to develop, while classic programming offers higher initial costs but long-term independence.

Iterations: Are frequent adjustments and rapid tests required, or is stable development required over the long term? Low-code enables rapid changes, while classic development allows deeper control over the code.

Traditional development use cases:

Classic development is particularly useful when companies need highly customized, powerful and scalable software in the long term. High-code platforms provide complete control over the source code, which is particularly advantageous in safety-critical areas such as finance, healthcare or industry. Companies that want to develop complex business software or highly individualized applications usually rely on traditional programming.

An example: A large e-commerce company needs a high-performance platform with specific integrations, an individual user experience, and tailored security standards. A low-code solution would quickly reach its limits here, as the requirements go beyond predefined modules.

Eine Unternehmerin organisiert ihr Lager mithilfe digitaler Tools, die durch Low Code Entwicklung erstellt wurden. Sie nutzt Laptop und Tablet zur Verwaltung von Bestellungen und Inventar. — It's not just e-commerce companies that benefit from low-code development.

Low-code app development use cases:

Low-code is particularly suitable for companies that want to quickly develop functional applications and automate processes. Especially in SMEs or start-ups that do not have large development teams, this method is an attractive solution. It enables quick time to market, as many features can be created via drag-and-drop or visual workflows. Low-code is particularly popular when developing internal tools, process automation or prototypes for new digital products.

A practical example: A construction company wants to introduce a digital HR tool to efficiently manage applications and employee data. With a low-code platform, a tailor-made solution can be implemented within a few weeks — including individual workflows for onboarding processes, absence management and internal communication. The advantage: The company saves high development costs and can flexibly adapt the system at any time.

The benefits of low-code development:

When things have to be fast and flexibility is required, low-code offers decisive advantages:

Quick launch: Thanks to prefabricated modules, applications can be developed in just a few weeks instead of months.

Cost-effective development: Less programming effort significantly reduces development costs.

Central platform: All important functions and integrations are bundled in one place, which makes it easier to keep an overview.

Easy adjustment: Changes can be implemented directly without in-depth programming knowledge.

Flexibly scalable: Low-code solutions grow with your business and adapt to new requirements.

Minor technical hurdle: Even specialist departments without IT knowledge can create their own applications.

Reusable modules: Modules that have already been developed can be used efficiently for other projects.

The benefits of traditional development:

When individuality, performance and full control are required, classic programming is unbeatable:

Maximum adaptability: Software can be tailored precisely to individual requirements and processes.

Full control: They keep the source code and are not dependent on external platforms.

Flexibility in technology: The choice of programming language and development environment is free and customizable.

Highest level of safety: Tailored security mechanisms and compliance requirements can be optimally implemented.

Long-term scalability: Applications are designed for growth and increasing requirements right from the start.

Wide range of uses: Solutions can be operated anywhere and used independently of third-party providers.

Conclusion: When low-code development is the better choice

Low-code is ideal for companies that want to develop digital solutions quickly and automate their processes efficiently. Start-ups and SMEs in particular benefit from the ease of use, lower costs and rapid market launch. However, when highly customized, high-performance or safety-critical software is required, classic programming is the better choice. Ultimately, the decision depends on individual requirements, budget and desired scalability — in many cases, a combination of both methods can also be useful.